Skip to main content

Command Query Responsibility Segregation

ArchitecturalEvent-drivenPerformanceScalabilityAbout 3 min

Also known as

  • CQRS

Intent

Command Query Responsibility Segregation aims to segregate the operations that modify the state of an application (commands) from the operations that read the state (queries).

Explanation

Real-world example

Imagine a modern library where the tasks of borrowing and returning books (commands) are handled at the front desk, while the task of searching for books and reading them (queries) happens in the reading area. The front desk optimizes for transaction efficiency and record-keeping, ensuring books are properly checked in and out. Meanwhile, the reading area is optimized for comfort and accessibility, making it easy for readers to find and engage with the books. This separation improves the library's overall efficiency and user experience, much like the CQRS pattern enhances a software system's performance and maintainability.

In plain words

The CQRS design pattern separates the actions of modifying data (commands) from the actions of retrieving data (queries) to enhance performance, scalability, and maintainability in software systems.

Microsoft's documentation says

CQRS separates reads and writes into different models, using commands to update data, and queries to read data.

Programmatic Example

One way to implement the Command Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS) pattern is to separate the read and write operations into different services.

Let's see the code implementation first and explain how it works afterward.

public static void main(String[] args) {

    // Create Authors and Books using CommandService
    var commands = new CommandServiceImpl();

    commands.authorCreated(AppConstants.E_EVANS, "Eric Evans", "evans@email.com");
    commands.authorCreated(AppConstants.J_BLOCH, "Joshua Bloch", "jBloch@email.com");
    commands.authorCreated(AppConstants.M_FOWLER, "Martin Fowler", "mFowler@email.com");

    commands.bookAddedToAuthor("Domain-Driven Design", 60.08, AppConstants.E_EVANS);
    commands.bookAddedToAuthor("Effective Java", 40.54, AppConstants.J_BLOCH);
    commands.bookAddedToAuthor("Java Puzzlers", 39.99, AppConstants.J_BLOCH);
    commands.bookAddedToAuthor("Java Concurrency in Practice", 29.40, AppConstants.J_BLOCH);
    commands.bookAddedToAuthor("Patterns of Enterprise"
            + " Application Architecture", 54.01, AppConstants.M_FOWLER);
    commands.bookAddedToAuthor("Domain Specific Languages", 48.89, AppConstants.M_FOWLER);
    commands.authorNameUpdated(AppConstants.E_EVANS, "Eric J. Evans");

    // Query the database using QueryService
    var queries = new QueryServiceImpl();

    var nullAuthor = queries.getAuthorByUsername("username");
    var evans = queries.getAuthorByUsername(AppConstants.E_EVANS);
    var blochBooksCount = queries.getAuthorBooksCount(AppConstants.J_BLOCH);
    var authorsCount = queries.getAuthorsCount();
    var dddBook = queries.getBook("Domain-Driven Design");
    var blochBooks = queries.getAuthorBooks(AppConstants.J_BLOCH);

    LOGGER.info("Author username : {}", nullAuthor);
    LOGGER.info("Author evans : {}", evans);
    LOGGER.info("jBloch number of books : {}", blochBooksCount);
    LOGGER.info("Number of authors : {}", authorsCount);
    LOGGER.info("DDD book : {}", dddBook);
    LOGGER.info("jBloch books : {}", blochBooks);

    HibernateUtil.getSessionFactory().close();
}
  1. Command Service: The CommandServiceImpl class is used for write operations. It provides methods to create authors and books, and to add books to authors.

  2. Query Service: The QueryServiceImpl class is used for read operations. It provides methods to get author and book details.

This separation of concerns allows for flexibility in how the application handles data access and manipulation, and is a key aspect of the CQRS pattern.

Program output:

17:37:56.040 [main] INFO  com.iluwatar.cqrs.app.App - Author username : null
17:37:56.040 [main] INFO  com.iluwatar.cqrs.app.App - Author evans : Author(name=Eric J. Evans, email=evans@email.com, username=eEvans)
17:37:56.041 [main] INFO  com.iluwatar.cqrs.app.App - jBloch number of books : 3
17:37:56.041 [main] INFO  com.iluwatar.cqrs.app.App - Number of authors : 3
17:37:56.041 [main] INFO  com.iluwatar.cqrs.app.App - DDD book : Book(title=Domain-Driven Design, price=60.08)
17:37:56.042 [main] INFO  com.iluwatar.cqrs.app.App - jBloch books : [Book(title=Effective Java, price=40.54), Book(title=Java Puzzlers, price=39.99), Book(title=Java Concurrency in Practice, price=29.4)]

Applicability

  • Systems requiring distinct models for read and write operations for scalability and maintainability.
  • Complex domain models where the task of updating objects differs significantly from the task of reading object data.
  • Scenarios where performance optimization for read operations is crucial, and the system can benefit from different data models or databases for reads and writes.

Known Uses

  • Distributed Systems and Microservices Architecture, where different services manage read and write responsibilities.
  • Event-Sourced Systems, where changes to the application state are stored as a sequence of events.
  • High-Performance Web Applications, segregating read and write databases to optimize load handling.

Consequences

Benefits:

  • Scalability: By separating read and write models, each can be scaled independently according to their specific demands.
  • Optimization: Allows for the optimization of read models for query efficiency and write models for transactional integrity.
  • Maintainability: Reduces complexity by separating the concerns, leading to cleaner, more maintainable code.
  • Flexibility: Offers the flexibility to choose different technologies for the read and write sides according to their requirements.

Trade-Offs:

  • Complexity: Introduces complexity due to synchronization between read and write models, especially in consistency maintenance.
  • Overhead: Might be an overkill for simple systems where the benefits do not outweigh the additional complexity.
  • Learning Curve: Requires a deeper understanding and careful design to implement effectively, increasing the initial learning curve.
  • Event Sourcingopen in new window: Often used in conjunction with CQRS, where changes to the application state are stored as a sequence of events.
  • Domain-Driven Design (DDD): CQRS fits well within the DDD context, providing clear boundaries and separation of concerns.
  • Repositoryopen in new window: Can be used to abstract the data layer, providing a more seamless integration between the command and query sides.

Credits